DC Journal Club - January Round Up
We are creeping up on the 1000 subscriber milestone! Keep reading, liking, commenting, sharing, and letting me know how I can help you.
Please let me know if you have any feedback for the newsletter or topics you’d like me to explore. You can email [laura at dcjournalclub dot com] or message on Substack or Instagram (@dcjournalclub).
I kicked off the new year with a list of ten questions I wish researchers would tackle and shared a quick take on five books from my shelf: Chrysta Bilton's Normal Family (2022), Peter Boni's Uprooted (2022), Susan Golombok's We Are Family (2020), Michael Slepian's The Secret Life of Secrets (2022), and David Plotz's The Genius Factory (2005).
In a guest post, Nick Ludwig shared how a mushroom ceremony helped him process his late donor conception discovery and led him to write a book and launch a podcast featuring donor-conceived people's stories. If you’d like to write a guest post, you can learn more about the process and send me a message!
Research Recap
Sørensen et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review of research about experiences with multiple donor half-siblings. A thematic synthesis of 18 studies involving 2,162 donor-conceived persons aged 12-65 across five countries found that initial reactions varied from curiosity and interest to indifference or concern. Those desiring connection faced practical challenges maintaining relationships across large, geographically dispersed sibling groups, though some successfully developed friendships. Half-sibling relationships provided valuable connections and belonging for some. However, these relationships also highlighted feelings of difference and created complications in family identity.
Fyfe et al. (2025) interviewed 11 participants from eight New Zealand families who used known donors and home insemination, exploring motivations and experiences. Financial barriers were primary drivers, with all but one identifying fertility clinic costs as inaccessible. Participants preferred home insemination as "normal, at-home, non-medical intervention" allowing greater autonomy, though some experienced clinics as unwelcoming and lacked clear procedural guidance, creating stress and awkward practical interactions. Couples prioritized "ideal donors" who were good people with aligned values and accessible throughout children's lives, with two Māori participants considering Māori donors essential for cultural identity and whakapapa connections. All couples rejected "dad" roles for donors, conceptualizing them as "helping uncles" or extended family, and created written agreements covering financial responsibilities, accessibility, and relationship expectations.
Kaplan Idelchuk et al. (2025) interviewed 19 Israeli healthcare professionals (sperm bank directors, genetic counselors, geneticists, IVF specialists) about recontacting sperm donors for expanded genetic testing. Approximately half believed recontacting donors before broader testing (like exome sequencing) is ethically appropriate. One-third advocated recontacting only after pathogenic findings, citing practical concerns about locating former donors and low positive result rates. Eleven participants proposed asking donors at donation which recontact approach they prefer. Three controversially suggested donor attitude toward future testing should be a selection parameter, arguing those refusing recontact might be unsuitable, raising concerns about violating the right not to know genetic information.
Ghelich-Khani et al. (2025) developed and validated a 26-item questionnaire measuring psychosocial needs of 180 Iranian women receiving donor oocytes. Four distinct themes emerged: 1) Need to Protect Marriage (worries about fertility problems and third-party involvement damaging marriage, sex life, and spousal understanding); 2) Need for Ethical and Legal Reassurance (requiring doctor trust, complete legal/ethical information, privacy protection, donor health confidence, and assurance donor won't claim the child); 3) Need for Parenting Support (concerns about developing mother-like feelings during pregnancy, bonding with genetically unrelated child, and succeeding in parent role); and 4) Need for Partner Support (requiring husband's emotional understanding, treatment support, and protection from family/friend blame).
Navarro-Marshall (2025) analyzed naturally occurring home conversations recorded by 17 Chilean families with donor-conceived children aged 3-8, followed by parent interviews with children and researcher interviews with parents. Parents universally struggled more with when and how to tell rather than whether to tell. All families described stories evolving from simple "seeds" to progressively adding eggs, donors, and family diversity concepts. When parents interviewed children immediately after conversations, 9 of 14 expressed positive emotions, with favorite elements mirroring general birth narratives (being born, tummy, having mothers) rather than donor-specific details. Three older children (7-8) expressed discomfort: two disliked donors despite never meeting them, one expressed sadness about lacking father and feeling lonely.
Other Tidbits
In Current Affairs, a donor-conceived woman writes about how her discovery that she has over 30 half-siblings through DNA testing led her to trace how decades of lies and little regulation in America's profit-driven fertility industry have created health risks and other problems for donor-conceived families.
An NPR investigation reveals how India's well-intentioned 2021 fertility laws inadvertently created a black market for donor eggs where vulnerable women are exploited.
When a woman's brother is tracked down by two of the 14 children resulting from his 1992 sperm donations, the family discovers unexpected connections through camping trips and surfing holidays, leading multiple family members, including the author herself, to seek ADHD diagnoses after realizing the trait runs through their entire biological line.
Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do.
- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe